fix: #7448
Current we skip on those experiments which already existed on both sides, but
do not exclude them from the result list. And if we have diverged experiment,
pulling/pushing them will stop the current progress and raise an exception, but
didn't give any information on the condition of other experiments.
1. Change the exp pull and push to match the new API in `scmrepo`.
2. Handle sync status after `exp pull/push` finished.
3. Bump scmrepo to 0.0.19
Co-authored-by:
There is no support for chunk_size kwarg in fs.open.
Also, `upload_fobj` is now able to figure out proper
chunk size from fileobj, so I don't think we need this on _upload_file.
Before, as we were not passing `total`, the Tqdm progress bar would not
show the bar or not show any progress on the bar. As we get that value lazily,
we should force it to always show the bar.
Also updated the progress bar to say which repo is being cloned.
This PR gets rid of Tqdm progress bars inside `dvc.objects`.
Those are replaced with multi-phase callback in `hashes_exist`, and
simple callable that takes `completed` value in
`odb._estimate_remote_size()`.
The `odb.list_hashes_exists()` and `odb.all()` now return iterables,
hence the caller has the responsibility of handling progress.
This is now handled in `dvc.data` by using a custom `Tqdm` progressbar.
This is ugly and is temporary, but my motivation is to remove tqdm from dvc.objects
first. We can gradually get rid of these from `dvc.data` too, but
that requires more knowledge about `dvc.data` and involves more
design work. All in time, I guess. :)
This PR gets rid of Tqdm progress bars inside `dvc.objects`.
Those are replaced with multi-phase callback in `hashes_exist`, and
simple callable that takes `completed` value in
`odb._estimate_remote_size()`.
The `odb.list_hashes_exists()` and `odb.all()` now return iterables,
hence the caller has the responsibility of handling progress.
This is now handled in `dvc.data` by using a custom `Tqdm` progressbar.
This is ugly and is temporary, but my motivation is to remove tqdm from dvc.objects
first. We can gradually get rid of these from `dvc.data` too, but
that requires more knowledge about `dvc.data` and involves more
design work. All in time, I guess. :)
It is not completely fsspec compliant, but it's upto the level
required by our FSSpecWrapper.
Next thing to tackle would be to merging `fs.base.FileSystem`
and `fs.fsspec_wrapper.FSSpecWrapper` into one filesystem
that is lazily-loaded and is itself fsspec-compliant.
Also adds a kwarg `cancel_on_error` on the constructor to support
cancelling futures on `shutdown`. This is not done by default to
be backward compatible with `concurrent.futures.ThreadPool` executor.
